Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
Standard
Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations. / Meisel, Thomas C.
In: Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 527-528.
In: Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 527-528.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
Harvard
Meisel, TC 2019, 'Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations', Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 527-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12303
APA
Vancouver
Meisel TC. Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. 2019 Dec 1;43(4):527-528. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12303
Author
Bibtex - Download
@article{4ae10491fc0f4984a4786f11b794f49c,
title = "Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations",
author = "Meisel, {Thomas C.}",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ggr.12303",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "527--528",
journal = "Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research",
issn = "1639-4488",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations
AU - Meisel, Thomas C.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075200261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ggr.12303
DO - 10.1111/ggr.12303
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:85075200261
VL - 43
SP - 527
EP - 528
JO - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
JF - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
SN - 1639-4488
IS - 4
ER -
